Showing posts with label health care debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care debate. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2009

MONTREAL GAZETTE DEFENDS CANADIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

by JC Leahy

PLEASE take a look at Canada's single-payer health-care system. That type of single-payer system is the STATED goal of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and many influential reformers in the United States.

The Montreal Gazette, a liberal Canadian newspaper, believes that Americans are mis-informed about Canadian health care. A link to that article is below. Believe it or not, the Gazette's DEFENSE of Canadian health care financing goes like this:

1. Health care waiting lines in Canada are "horrible" and getting worse.

2. There is "something fundamentally wrong when individuals in this country (Canada) are forbidden from spending their own money on their own health - unless they go abroad."

3. HOWEVER, the US system is worse because the US has lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality rates.

Hmmm...This assumes that life expectancy and infant mortality depend on the health-care financing system. Actually, however, infant mortality depends largely on low-birth-weight babies, the prevalence of which, in turn, depends very much on race. Life expectancy also, statistically, varies by race. For example, the United States' longest-living group seems to be Japanese Americans. If a single-payer system would make people live longer, Japanese in Japan would live longer than Japanese in America. However, Japanese live about the same length of time whether in Japan or America. Canada's population is mostly white with some Asian, but few blacks. That actually accounts for the differences in infant mortality and life expectancy.

On the other hand, what the Motreal gazette calls "horrible" waiting lines are definitely caused by the single-payer system. Everyone knows and admits this. Also, the ban on spending money on one's own health care results from the single-payer system. After all, if there are "horrible" waiting lines, wouldn't it be unfair to let the "rich" jump to the front of the line just by paying for their own health care??

The Canadian single-payer health care financing system is bad for Canadians. Even it's advoates admit that it creates "horrible" waiting lines. Also it forces many sick people to seek health care outside Canada -- or worse, to die waiting for care. Barack Obama's brand of health care reform is a giant step along the pathway to a Canadian style single-payer system. Democrats are trying to rush this plan through passage before we have a chance to debate it or even to read the legislative bill!! They need to be stopped immediately!!!!

Please, shake off your apathy (if any) and call every senator and congressional representative that you can!!!!!!!!!!!! Now. Here's the link to contact them:

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

QUESTION: WHAT ABOUT HEALTH CARE IN EUROPE ???

.

This question come from James Louloudes, Silver Spring, MD

QUESTION:

Regardless of political views, I found it interesting that Canada is claiming major problems with their Health Care System. (See the link to a Fox News article, below.) I didn't see this listed in any of the major news papers and thought it to be odd since it's a very hot topic these days. I wonder how European countries are faring?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539943,00.html?test=health

ANSWER:

Well, James, the Fox News article is certainly informative. I would add that Canadians who view their own health as "fair" or "poor," 54% (which is to say, Canadians who are actually sick) say that a shortage of health care professionals and hospital beds is the "biggest problem" with their health care -- compared to 5% in the United States. Actual treatment statistics bear out their perceptions: Only 5% of US patients have to wait more than 4 months for surgery, compared to 27% in Canada (and 36% in Britian, and 23% in Australia, and 26% in New Zealand, by the way).

I can tell you that a number of European countries have had their own serious problems with their single-payer national health insurance -- in fact, there has been pressure to actually back away from the single-payer model. According to Goodman et al., Lives at Risk, page 10, "Despite official rhetoric, over the course of the past decade almost every European country with a national health care system has introduced market-oriented reforms and turned to the private sector to reduce the costs of care and increase the value, availability and effectiveness of treatments. In making these changes, more often than not these countries looked to the United States for guidance." They give a long list of examples. Check out that book, especially pages 10 -11 for details!

JC Leahy
RN, BSN, MA, ACLS
2009 "100 Most Outstanding Nurses" Award, Wash, DC
Director, Health Professionals for Meaningful Change

.