Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Congressman Chris Van Hollen Un-Apologetically Defends the "Democratic Health Care Disaster"

-
By Congressman Chris Van Hollen

I respectfully disagree [that HR 3590 is a disasterous health care bill] . After careful consideration of the provisions in this bill, I came to the conclusion that the changes would ultimately benefit health care consumers in our community. I voted for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (HR 3590) which passed the House of Representatives through the traditional voting process by a count of 219-212. President Obama signed this bill into law on March 23, 2010. I also voted for the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HR 4872), which contained important changes to the Senate bill and passed the House by a vote of 220-207.


Let me be clear, this bill does not entail a government takeover of health care. This health reform builds on the current system of private health insurance. Every American will still be able to choose his or her own doctor and private health insurance plan - and make care decisions with that doctor. In fact, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, private insurance coverage will expand by 16 million under this bill.

This legislation includes ideas from across the political spectrum, incorporating hundreds of amendments from Republican members of Congress as it moved through committees. It has been endorsed by hundreds of non-partisan health care groups, including the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, the American Hospital Association, the AARP, the American College of Physicians, the National Association of Community Health Centers, and the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. A full list of the organizations who have endorsed the bill is available here: http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/reports?id=0323.

In the next six months, Americans will begin to see the benefits of a health care system that works for them and not the insurance industry. Children with pre-existing conditions will no longer be denied coverage and young people will be able to remain on their parents' insurance up to their 26th birthday. Health plans will be banned from placing lifetime caps on coverage, small businesses will be given tax credits so that they can provide affordable health coverage, and we will begin to close the Medicare Part D doughnut hole and help seniors pay for their high prescription drug costs.

Over time, we will prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage to any customer based on pre-existing conditions, create health insurance exchanges so that Americans have the same choices as Members of Congress, extend health care coverage to an additional 32 million Americans, ensure middle class families can afford insurance by providing the biggest tax cut for health care in U.S. history, and reduce the deficit by over a trillion dollars in the next two decades.

Health care reform expands the number of trained doctors in our country to ensure that access to doctors is not a problem. These provisions include providing new scholarships, loans, and loan repayment help to help recruit new doctors and nurses into the profession, especially primary care providers. The bill will make sure we are training the right kinds of doctors to meet our needs and provide incentives for them to better coordinate health care.

Because small businesses are our engines of economic growth and our number one job creators, this legislation provides $40 billion in tax credits for small businesses to help them offer employee health insurance coverage - if they choose to do so. This year qualified small business employers will be eligible for a sliding-scale tax credit, worth up to 35 percent of a small business's premium costs. In 2014, Health Insurance Exchanges, competitive marketplaces of private insurers, will enable small businesses and their employees to purchase affordable coverage and pool their buying power through access to the same quality plans only available to large firms today.

Finally, the legislation makes significant strides towards reducing the deficit. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, health care costs have been rising for several years, surpassing $2.3 trillion in 2008 and accounting for 16.2% of the nation's gross domestic product. Health care expenditures have outpaced inflation and income growth. And the cost growth was straining the systems used to finance health care, including private employer-sponsored insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. This growth was simply not sustainable for families or the government.

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the health care reform signed by the President cuts the deficit by $143 billion in the first ten years and $1.2 trillion in the second ten years. Half of the bill is paid for by ending overpayments to private insurance companies in the Medicare Advantage Program as well as cracking down on fraud, waste, and abuse. Currently, Medicare Advantage plans cost the government an average of 14% more (and in some regions of the country 20% more) without providing better service than traditional plans. The remaining cost of the bill is offset by targeted fees on health insurance providers, pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers who will be benefitting from reform, phased-in revenue increases on so-called "Super Cadillac" plans that fail to bring their costs under control, and a modest Medicare surcharge on the top 2% of American households. Beginning in 2013, individual filers with income above $200,000 and joint filers with income above $250,000 will begin to pay Medicare taxes on unearned income above those limits, as well as an additional 0.9 percentage points on wages and self-employment above those limits. In addition to paying for reform and reducing the deficit, these revenue enhancements will extend the solvency of Medicare by an additional nine years.


But the bill helps rein in health care costs, as well. In the health insurance exchanges, consumers will be empowered to choose the best private insurer, based on public ratings, premium costs, and quality of care, which should lead to companies competing to offer the best rates. And, because of the individual mandate, they will be selling to a larger pool, spreading out risk.

This was not a perfect bill, and there will be more work to do to manage health care costs. But I believe it is a good approach, building on what works in our current system, expanding private insurance markets, and establishing important consumer protections, especially for those with pre-existing conditions.

Please let me know whenever I may be of assistance to you.

Sincerely,
Chris Van Hollen
Member of Congress

COUNTERPOINT:

For a physician's point of view about the Democratic Health Care Disaster, CLICK HERE .

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Food for Thought: Physician Letter on Democratic Health Care Disaster

The following item was submitted by Barbara Leahy:

An Indianapolis doctor's letter to Sen. Bayh about the Bill (Note: Dr. Stephen E. Frazer, MD practices as an anesthesiologist in Indianapolis, IN ) Here is a letter I sent to Senator Bayh.. Feel free to copy it and send it around to all other representatives. -- Stephen Fraser

Senator Bayh,

As a practicing physician I have major concerns with the health care bill before Congress. I actually have read the bill and am shocked by the brazenness of the government's proposed involvement in the patient-physician relationship. The very idea that the government will dictate and ration patient care is dangerous and certainly not helpful in designing a health care system that works for all. Every physician I work with agrees that we need to fix our health care system, but the proposed bills currently making their way through congress will be a disaster if passed.

I ask you respectfully and as a patriotic American to look at the following troubling lines that I have read in the bill. You cannot possibly believe that these proposals are in the best interests of the country and our fellow citizens.

Page 22 of the HC Bill: Mandates that the Govt will audit books of all employers that self-insure!!

Page 30 Sec 123 of HC bill: THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get.

Page 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill: YOUR HEALTH CARE IS RATIONED!!!

Page 42 of HC Bill: The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC benefits for you. You have no choice!

Page 50 Section 152 in HC bill: HC will be provided to ALL non-US citizens, illegal or otherwise.

Page 58 HC Bill: Govt will have real-time access to individuals' finances & a 'National ID Health card' will be issued! (Papers please!)

Page 59 HC Bill lines 21-24: Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for elective funds transfer. (Time for more cash and carry)

Page 65 Sec 164: Is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in unions & community organizations: (ACORN).

Page 84 Sec 203 HC bill: Govt mandates ALL benefit packages for private HC plans in the 'Exchange.'

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans -- The Govt will ration your health care!

Page 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill: Govt mandates linguistic appropriate services. (Translation: illegal aliens.)

Page 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18: The Govt will use groups (i.e. ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan.

Page 85 Line 7 HC Bill: Specifications of Benefit Levels for Plans. (AARP members - your health care WILL be rationed!)

Page 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill: Medicaid eligible individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. (No choice.)

Page 124 lines 24-25 HC: No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Govt monopoly.

Page 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill: Doctors/ American Medical Association - The Govt will tell YOU what salary you can make.

Page 145 Line 15-17: An Employer MUST auto-enroll employees into public option plan. (NO choice!)

Page 126 Lines 22-25: Employers MUST pay for HC for part-time employees ANDtheir families. (Employees shouldn't get excited about this as employers will be forced to reduce its work force, benefits, and wages/salaries to cover such a huge expense.)

Page 149 Lines 16-24: ANY Employer with payroll 401k & above who does not provide public option will pay 8% tax on all payroll! (See the last comment in parenthesis.)

Page 150 Lines 9-13: A business with payroll between $251K & $401K who doesn't provide public option will pay 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Page 167 Lines 18-23: ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Page 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill: Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay.) (Like always)

Page 195 HC Bill: Officers & employees of the GOVT HC Admin.. will have access to ALL Americans' finances and personal records. (I guess so they can 'deduct' their fees)

Page 203 Line 14-15 HC: "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax." (Yes, it really says that!) ( a 'fee' instead)

Page 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill: Govt will reduce physician services for Medicaid Seniors. (Low-income and the poor are affected.)

Page 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill: Doctors: It doesn't matter what specialty you have trained yourself in -- you will all be paid the same! (Just TRY to tell me that's not Socialism!)

Page 253 Line 10-18: The Govt sets the value of a doctor's time, profession, judgment, etc. (Literally-- the value of humans.)

Page 265 Sec 1131: The Govt mandates and controls productivity for "private" HC industries.

Page 268 Sec 1141: The federal Govt regulates the rental and purchase of power driven wheelchairs.

Page 272 SEC. 1145: TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 280 Sec 1151: The Govt will penalize hospitals for whatever the Govt deems preventable (i.e...re-admissions).

Page 298 Lines 9-11: Doctors: If you treat a patient during initial admission that results in a re-admission -- the Govt will penalize you.

Page 317 L 13-20: PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. (The Govt tells doctors what and how much they can own!)

Page 317-318 lines 21-25, 1-3: PROHIBITION on expansion. (The Govt is mandating that hospitals cannot expand.)

Page 321 2-13: Hospitals have the opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input is required. (Can you say ACORN?)

Page 335 L 16-25 Pg 336-339: The Govt mandates establishment of=2 outcome-based measures. (HC the way they want -- rationing.)

Page 341 Lines 3-9: The Govt has authority to disqualify Medicare Advance Plans, HMOs, etc. (Forcing people into the Govt plan)

Page 354 Sec 1177: The Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of 'special needs people!' Unbelievable!

Page 379 Sec 1191: The Govt creates more bureaucracy via a "Tele-Health Advisory Committee." (Can you say HC by phone?)


Page 425 Lines 4-12: The Govt mandates "Advance-Care Planning Consult." (Think senior citizens end-of-life patients.)

Page 425 Lines 17-19: The Govt will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. (And it's mandatory!)

Page 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3: The Govt provides an "approved" list of end-of-life resources; guiding you in death. (Also called 'assisted suicide.')(Sounds like Soylent Green to me.)

Page 427 Lines 15-24: The Govt mandates a program for orders on "end-of-life." (The Govt has a say in how your life ends!)

Page 429 Lines 1-9: An "advanced-care planning consultant" will be used frequently as a patient's health deteriorates.

Page 429 Lines 10-12: An "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end-of-life plans.. (AN ORDER TO DIE FROM THE GOVERNMENT?!?)

Page 429 Lines 13-25: The GOVT will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.. (I wouldn't want to stand before God after getting paid for THAT job!)

Page 430 Lines 11-15: The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end-of-life! (Again -- no choice!)

Page 469: Community-Based Home Medical Services = Non-Profit Organizations. (Hello? ACORN Medical Services here!?!)

Page 489 Sec 1308: The Govt will cover marriage and family therapy. (Which means Govt will insert itself into your marriage even.)

Page 494-498: Govt will cover Mental Health Services including defining, creating, and rationing those services.

Senator, I guarantee that I personally will do everything possible to inform patients and my fellow physicians about the dangers of the proposed bills you and your colleagues are debating.

Furthermore, if you vote for a bill that enforces socialized medicine on the country and destroys the doctor-patient relationship, I will do everything in my power to make sure you lose your job in the next election.

Respectfully,
Stephen E. Fraser, MD

(Comment: The above is food for thought, discussion, and action. -- JC Leahy)

Thursday, October 22, 2009

MONTREAL GAZETTE DEFENDS CANADIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

by JC Leahy

PLEASE take a look at Canada's single-payer health-care system. That type of single-payer system is the STATED goal of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and many influential reformers in the United States.

The Montreal Gazette, a liberal Canadian newspaper, believes that Americans are mis-informed about Canadian health care. A link to that article is below. Believe it or not, the Gazette's DEFENSE of Canadian health care financing goes like this:

1. Health care waiting lines in Canada are "horrible" and getting worse.

2. There is "something fundamentally wrong when individuals in this country (Canada) are forbidden from spending their own money on their own health - unless they go abroad."

3. HOWEVER, the US system is worse because the US has lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality rates.

Hmmm...This assumes that life expectancy and infant mortality depend on the health-care financing system. Actually, however, infant mortality depends largely on low-birth-weight babies, the prevalence of which, in turn, depends very much on race. Life expectancy also, statistically, varies by race. For example, the United States' longest-living group seems to be Japanese Americans. If a single-payer system would make people live longer, Japanese in Japan would live longer than Japanese in America. However, Japanese live about the same length of time whether in Japan or America. Canada's population is mostly white with some Asian, but few blacks. That actually accounts for the differences in infant mortality and life expectancy.

On the other hand, what the Motreal gazette calls "horrible" waiting lines are definitely caused by the single-payer system. Everyone knows and admits this. Also, the ban on spending money on one's own health care results from the single-payer system. After all, if there are "horrible" waiting lines, wouldn't it be unfair to let the "rich" jump to the front of the line just by paying for their own health care??

The Canadian single-payer health care financing system is bad for Canadians. Even it's advoates admit that it creates "horrible" waiting lines. Also it forces many sick people to seek health care outside Canada -- or worse, to die waiting for care. Barack Obama's brand of health care reform is a giant step along the pathway to a Canadian style single-payer system. Democrats are trying to rush this plan through passage before we have a chance to debate it or even to read the legislative bill!! They need to be stopped immediately!!!!

Please, shake off your apathy (if any) and call every senator and congressional representative that you can!!!!!!!!!!!! Now. Here's the link to contact them:

Thursday, August 27, 2009

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: WASHINGTON POST, AUG. 23, 2009

.
Dear Washington Post Editor:
In his article of August 4 ("For Doctors, Rationing Care is Standard Practice"), infectious-disease Dr. Manoj K. Jain's thesis is that America is "rationing care, just like the Canadians and British, with long wait times." Americans would do well to understand that Dr. Jain is way off base!!! Canadian and British health-care rationing differ in both degree and type from the "rationing" that occurs in the United States.

Dr. Jain shows no appreciateion for the extreme severety of rationing in Canada or Britain as compared with the United States. Dr. Jain does not mention that, in terms of availability of health care technology per 100,000 of population, of the 29 member OECD nations, Canada ranks dead last!!! Dr. Jain does not mention that for Canadians, it is easier to get an MRI for one's dog than for one's self. Nor does he mention that, while 40% of Oregon's hospitals can offer transplant services, in nearby British Columbia the figure ZERO percent. Nor does Dr. Jain mention that while 40% of Oregon hospitals can save your life with coronary balloon angioplasty, only 1 in 10 British Columbia hospitals can. Nor does he mention that, by the Canadian government's own admission, 20-30% of Canadians in queue for coronary bypass surgery have grown too unstable to tolerate the surgery, while waiting. That doesn't count those who have been removed from the queue because they died while waiting. The Canadian and British health care systems are designed to ration health care by preventing the existence of technological equipment, facilities, and specialists. In the United States, on the other hand, what Dr. Jain calls "rationing" relies much more on the very sort of case-by-case evaluation-of-benefit that Dr. Jain actually describes in his article.

Canada's single-payor health care system is a severe disaster for those who are actually sick!!!That is why Canadians spend a billion dollars per year for US health care. Canadian and British health care rationing differs in both degree and type from rationing that occurs in the United States. For Dr. Jain to equate United States and Canadian/British health care rationing shows a fundamental lack of understanding.

JC Leahy, RN, BSN, MA, ACLS
2009 "100 Most Outstanding Nurses" Award, Washington, DC
Director, Health Professionals for Meaningful Change
jcleahy@jaitoday.com

Sunday, August 2, 2009

WHO THE HECK IS JC LEAHY?

Mr. Leahy is a seasoned registered nurse currently managing a 4,000-patient-per-year outpatient otolaryngology (ENT) clinic in a major Washington, DC medical center.  He aspires to make a unique contribution to health care by combining his nursing experience with his business experience.  Mr. Leahy has degrees in Business Administration and advanced Accounting.  He also has corporate and small-business experience in budgeting, financial planning, financial management, project management, proposal writing, and administrative management.   Mr. Leahy’s nursing experience includes 10 years in bedside intensive care. 
 While managing his 4,000-patient-per-year, Mr. Leahy was able to manage his schedule to serve as Cancer Treatment Coordinator for the Otolaryngology (ENT) service of a Washington, DC medical center, Feb., 2009-May, 2012.  Mr. Leahy’s results were so dramatic that the Medical Center made a public display about his work in its Inspiration Hallway section from August 2010 until early 2012.  By creating and managing a 7-element cancer care navigation system, he helped reduce the time from initial ENT consultation to the start of treatment from an average 100 days to less than 30 days.  This is important because cancer treatments are most effective when performed early.

Mr. Leahy designed the Plan of Care Exceptions Report (POC) as one element of this 7-element care navigation and management system. The Plan of Care Exception Report (POC) went live in May 2011. It’s purpose is to quickly identify patient non-compliance and similar deviations from cancer treatment plans.  For ENT cancer patients, the report identifies all missed appointment throughout medical center.  It also gives an indicator of why the appointment was missed – patient cancelled, clinic cancelled, no-show, etc.  It calculates a reliability factor to measure how often their appointments are kept, and it also lists when the patient was last seen In the ENT Clinic and when he is scheduled to be seen next.  Deceased patients can be included or excluded, or you can print a report for only deceased patients.  The medical center is now preparing to roll out the program to other services besides ENT and  other medical centers in the region.



The Plan of Care Exceptions Report was not developed in a vacuum.  In February, 2009, the ENT Chief was grappling with serious delays in the treatment of ENT cancer.   She tasked Mr. Leahy to expedite treatment of Head and Neck cancer patients.  In response to this assignment, he created a 7-element care navigation and management system.   It’s purpose is to track, coordinate, instigate, facilitate, and educate.  The graph below shows success in reducing the average time from initial ENT consult (or other “start” event) until commencement of treatment (or negative diagnosis).   This “days-to-begin-ENT-cancer-treatment” has fallen from 100 days at the beginning of 2009 to around 30 days  as of May 31, 2012.  The improvement from 100 days to less than 30 days was dramatic enough that the Medical Center displayed a poster and graph about it in the “Inspiration Hallway” public area for nearly a year and a half, until early this year.
The Seven Elements of Expediting Cancer Treatment Employed by John Leahy for Head and Neck Cancer, February 2009 – May, 2012.
ONE: Early identification of potential cancer patients by frequent review of new consults. Here’s an example of how this benefits veterans:  While reviewing consults in early June, 2012, Mr. Leahy realized that 2 consults sounded like probable head-and neck cancer, and they both had initial ENT Clinic appointments scheduled for June 27.  I phoned both veterans and changed their appointments to June 7.  On June 7, both came to clinic and both were bona-fide ENT cancer cases.  End result: By simply looking at their consults and acting early, Mr. Leahy advanced their cancer treatments by 20 days each before they had even seen an ENT physician!
TWO:  Setting aside a block of appointments every week specifically for patients who should not wait for a “next-available” appointment, but instead should be seen on an expedited basis.
THREE: Establishing an Excel-based work breakdown structure, or plan, for each cancer patient’s prospective diagnosis and care.  Each patient’s treatment is treated as an individual project to be managed and expedited.  Each patient’s WBS-sheet also serves as a place for memos about plans, problems, and face-sheet data.  This is where Mr. Leahy tracks  what is planned and what has happend for each patient.
FOUR: Maintenance of an Outlook based task list to make sure planned elements of cancer treatment do not fall through the cracks.  A perfect example this benefits veterans happened this week.    Mr. B had been diagnosed in September 2011 with buccal SCCA, easily cured if treated early.  Mr. B had had stubbornly refused to come to the hospital for treatment.  ENT physicians had declared that no further effort was needed because the patient had refused care.  But the Mr. Leahy made an entry onto his task list to try again later .  When the “try again” task came due, he crafted and mailed to Mr. B  a special letter designed to be opened,  read carefully, and not thrown in the trash without due consideration.  Two weeks later, Mr. B phoned Mr. Leahy.  Mr. Leahy outlined the long-term danger of the cancer and  encouraged Mr. B to talk about why he was refusing care.  He confided that he was afraid.  He and  Mr. Leahy talked together about fear.  At the end of the conversation, Mr. B accepted an appointment for June 12, and agreed to not miss that appointment no matter WHAT might happen.  On June 12, he came to clinic as promised -- even though he only had one leg and needed to take a taxi with his wheelchair.  His cancer was excised then-and-there in ENT Clinic.  Days-to-Treatment: 303 – which is why that third-quarter-2011 spike in the above graph represents an accomplishment, not a setback.
FIVE: Establishment of a calendar so that we can see important elements of what is happening with all ENT cancer patients on any particular day
SIX:  Identification of non-compliant patients and other deviations from the treatment-plan using the Plan of Care Exceptions Report
SEVEN: Establishment of a repeating list of cancer patients needing post-treatment or during-treatment follow-up, with frequencies that vary from q-month to q-year.  This ensures that post-treatment Clinic follow-up visits do not fall through the cracks.
*************
Mr. Leahy lives in an old farmhouse in the Washington, DC suburbs.  He and his wife have four daughters.  He enjoys reading, hiking, photography, and trap shooting.